When the pressure on a sample of a dry gas is held constant, the Kelvin temperature and the volume will be directly related.
This directly proportional relationship can be written as:
This law describes how a gas expands as the temperature increases; conversely, a decrease in temperature will lead to a decrease in volume. For comparing the same substance under two different sets of conditions, the law can be written as:
The equation shows that, as absolute temperature increases, the volume of the gas also increases in proportion.
The law was named after scientist Jacques Charles, who formulated the original law in his unpublished work from the 1780s.
In two of a series of four essays presented between 2 and 30 October 1801, John Dalton demonstrated by experiment that all the gases and vapours that he studied, expanded by the same amount between two fixed points of temperature. The French natural philosopher Joseph Louis Gay-Lussac confirmed the discovery in a presentation to the French National Institute on 31 Jan 1802, although he credited the discovery to unpublished work from the 1780s by Jacques Charles. The basic principles had already been described by Guillaume Amontons and Francis Hauksbee a century earlier.
Dalton was the first to demonstrate that the law applied generally to all gases, and to the vapours of volatile liquids if the temperature was well above the boiling point. Gay-Lussac concurred. With measurements only at the two thermometric fixed points of water, Gay-Lussac was unable to show that the equation relating volume to temperature was a linear function. On mathematical grounds alone, Gay-Lussac’s paper does not permit the assignment of any law stating the linear relation. Both Dalton’s and Gay-Lussac’s main conclusions can be expressed mathematically as:
where V100 is the volume occupied by a given sample of gas at 100 °C; V0 is the volume occupied by the same sample of gas at 0 °C; and k is a constant which is the same for all gases at constant pressure. This equation does not contain the temperature and so has nothing to do with what became known as Charles’s Law. Gay-Lussac’s value for k ( 1⁄2.6666), was identical to Dalton’s earlier value for vapours and remarkably close to the present-day value of 1⁄2.7315. Gay-Lussac gave credit for this equation to unpublished statements by his fellow Republican citizen J. Charles in 1787. In the absence of a firm record, the gas law relating volume to temperature cannot be named after Charles. Dalton’s measurements had much more scope regarding temperature than Gay-Lussac, not only measuring the volume at the fixed points of water, but also at two intermediate points. Unaware of the inaccuracies of mercury thermometers at the time, which were divided into equal portions between the fixed points, Dalton, after concluding in Essay II that in the case of vapours, “any elastic fluid expands nearly in a uniform manner into 1370 or 1380 parts by 180 degrees (Fahrenheit) of heat”, was unable to confirm it for gases. His conclusion for vapours is a clear statement of what become known wrongly as Charles’s Law, then even more wrongly as Gay-Lussac’s law, but never correctly as Dalton’s 2nd law. His 1st law was that of partial pressures.
Charles’s law appears to imply that the volume of a gas will descend to zero at a certain temperature (−266.66 °C according to Gay-Lussac’s figures) or −273.15 °C. Gay-Lussac was clear in his description that the law was not applicable at low temperatures:
but I may mention that this last conclusion cannot be true except so long as the compressed vapors remain entirely in the elastic state; and this requires that their temperature shall be sufficiently elevated to enable them to resist the pressure which tends to make them assume the liquid state.
Gay-Lussac had no experience of liquid air (first prepared in 1877), although he appears to believe (as did Dalton) that the “permanent gases” such as air and hydrogen could be liquified. Gay-Lussac had also worked with the vapours of volatile liquids in demonstrating Charles’s law, and was aware that the law does not apply just above the boiling point of the liquid:
I may however remark that when the temperature of the ether is only a little above its boiling point, its condensation is a little more rapid than that of atmospheric air. This fact is related to a phenomenon which is exhibited by a great many bodies when passing from the liquid to the solid state, but which is no longer sensible at temperatures a few degrees above that at which the transition occurs.
This is what we might anticipate, when we reflect that infinite cold must correspond to a finite number of degrees of the air-thermometer below zero; since if we push the strict principle of graduation, stated above, sufficiently far, we should arrive at a point corresponding to the volume of air being reduced to nothing, which would be marked as −273° of the scale (−100/.366, if .366 be the coefficient of expansion); and therefore −273° of the air-thermometer is a point which cannot be reached at any finite temperature, however low.
However, the “absolute zero” on the Kelvin temperature scale was originally defined in terms of the second law of thermodynamics, which Thomson himself described in 1852. Thomson did not assume that this was equal to the “zero-volume point” of Charles’s law, merely that Charles’s law provided the minimum temperature which could be attained. The two can be shown to be equivalent by Ludwig Boltzmann’s statistical view of entropy (1870).
However, Charles also stated:
The kinetic theory of gases relates the macroscopic properties of gases, such as pressure and volume, to the microscopic properties of the molecules which make up the gas, particularly the mass and speed of the molecules. In order to derive Charles’s law from kinetic theory, it is necessary to have a microscopic definition of temperature: this can be conveniently taken as the temperature being proportional to the average kinetic energy of the gas molecules, Ek:
Under this definition, the demonstration of Charles’s law is almost trivial. The kinetic theory equivalent of the ideal gas law relates PV to the average kinetic energy:
Newton’s laws of motion are three physical laws that, together, laid the foundation for classical mechanics. They describe the relationship between a body and the forces acting upon it, and its motion in response to those forces. More precisely, the first law defines the force qualitatively, the second law offers a quantitative measure of the force, and the third asserts that a single isolated force doesn’t exist. These three laws have been expressed in several different ways, over nearly three centuries, and can be summarised as follows.
|First law:||In an inertial reference frame, an object either remains at rest or continues to move at a constant velocity, unless acted upon by a force.|
|Second law:||In an inertial reference frame, the vector sum of the forces F on an object is equal to the mass m of that object multiplied by the acceleration a of the object: F = ma.|
|Third law:||When one body exerts a force on a second body, the second body simultaneously exerts a force equal in magnitude and opposite in direction on the first body.|
The three laws of motion were first compiled by Isaac Newton in his Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica (Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy), first published in 1687. Newton used them to explain and investigate the motion of many physical objects and systems. For example, in the third volume of the text, Newton showed that these laws of motion, combined with his law of universal gravitation, explained Kepler’s laws of planetary motion.
Newton’s laws of motion are three physical laws that, together, laid the foundation for classical mechanics. They describe the relationship between a body and the forces acting upon it, and its motion in response to those forces. More precisely, the first law defines the force qualitatively, the second law offers a quantitative measure of the force, and the third asserts that a single isolated force doesn’t exist. These three laws have been expressed in several different ways, over nearly three centuries, and can be summarised as follows. First law: In an inertial reference frame, an object either remains at rest or continues to move at a constant velocity, unless acted upon by a force. Second law: In an inertial reference frame, the vector sum of the forces F on an object is equal to the mass m of that object multiplied by the acceleration a of the object: F = ma. Third law: When one body exerts a force on a second body, the second body simultaneously exerts a force equal in magnitude and opposite in direction on the first body. The three laws of motion were first compiled by Isaac Newton in his Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica (Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy), first published in 1687. Newton used them to explain and investigate the motion of many physical objects and systems. For example, in the third volume of the text, Newton showed that these laws of motion, combined with his law of universal gravitation, explained Kepler’s laws of planetary motion.
It is time for another post with inspirational quotes.
This time Id like to focus on something I find very
School may have been – or still be – boring, a killer
of creativity or downright awful for you.
But education is still important because it opens the
mind and expands it. And if your years in school
were bad or boring you can still educate yourself
Anyways, here is some wisdom and inspiration
from the people who have walked before us.
It is impossible for a man to learn what he thinks he
Have you ever been at sea in a dense fog, when it
seemed as if a tangible white darkness shut you in
and the great ship, tense and anxious, groped her
way toward the shore with plummet and sounding-
line, and you waited with beating heart for
something to happen? I was like that ship before my
education began, only I was without compass or
sounding line, and no way of knowing how near the
harbor was. “Light! Give me light!” was the
wordless cry of my soul, and the light of love shone
on me in that very hour.
If the only tool you have is a hammer, you tend to
see every problem as a nail.
You can teach a student a lesson for a day; but if
you can teach him to learn by creating curiosity, he
will continue the learning process as long as he
Clay P. Bedford
Aim for success, not perfection. Never give up your
right to be wrong, because then you will lose the
ability to learn new things and move forward with
your life. Remember that fear always lurks behind
David M. Burns
A teacher affects eternity; he can never tell where
his influence stops.
Henry B Adams
Keep away from people who try to belittle your
ambitions. Small people always do that, but the
really great make you feel that you, too, can
The first problem for all of us, men and women, is
not to learn, but to unlearn.
Children have never been very good at listening to
their elders, but they have never failed to imitate
Education is a progressive discovery of our own
The difference between school and life? In school,
you’re taught a lesson and then given a test. In life,
you’re given a test that teaches you a lesson.
Tell me and I’ll forget; show me and I may
remember; involve me and I’ll understand.
If someone is going down the wrong road, he
doesn’t need motivation to speed him up. What he
needs is education to turn him around.
People learn something every day, and a lot of
times it’s that what they learned the day before was
Education cost money, but then so does ignorance.
What sculpture is to a block of marble
education is to the human soul.
Education makes a people easy to lead
but difficult to drive: easy to govern, but impossible
Do not train children to learning by force and
harshness, but direct them to it by what amuses
their minds, so that you may be better able to
discover with accuracy the peculiar bent of the
genius of each.
It is in fact a part of the function of education to help
us escape, not from our own time — for we are
bound by that — but from the intellectual and
emotional limitations of our time.
If people did not do silly things, nothing intelligent
would ever get done.
The beautiful thing about learning is that no one can
take it away from you.